Where your author considers buying things that are not very practical

2021-11-16 19:00:20 By : Ms. Amy Wei

It's been a few weeks since I sold Golf Sportwagen back to the dealer, and if any of you want a very clean golf without water problems, it is still there. Since then, I found myself gazing out from the kitchen window at the empty driveway where golf once lived. This gives me a lot of ideas, unrealistic ideas.

Given that I have no human or animal dependence, I think it might be time to have something less practical than a carriage. Before the golf station wagon, it was the Subaru station wagon, and before that, it was the Chevrolet Tahoe truck station wagon. On an impractical basis, I have been considering some requirements and considering potential candidates. The spreadsheet hasn't been processed yet, but soon.

The first consideration is cost. The cost of this new (used) car must be the same as or lower than the cash I recovered from the golf, because I will not invest more money in this second-hand car. This is a record $22,500. I am not interested in any old-fashioned rides without seat belts or air-conditioning and equipped with carburetor-there is no old Pontiac for me. Reliability is important because I am not keen on continuous maintenance of flaky or too old things, in which case parts must be removed from what you pull out. It probably shouldn't be a car that people consider "classic" because it always parks outside in Ohio weather.

I'm open to things with two doors, but I'm not interested in hatchbacks. I am definitely not looking for a two-door SUV. My thoughts are mainly focused on the coupe or convertible. In addition to the purchase specific requirements, I also apply the two basic restrictions for any car purchase: no black paint, no black interior, and no manual transmission. After reading the above content, I believe your finger just wants to make a suggestion, but before you make a suggestion, let me show you three cars that I don’t consider.

The R129 SL is great. I like the way it looks because I saw new scrolls when I was a kid. Styling, WideTrac appearance, simple lines, two tones-all of them. I think they are a bit underestimated at the moment, and I believe they will see big collectors' cars in the future. You can choose six, eight or 12 cylinders, because they all look great. Having said that, I will not be excited about parking outside. As far as I know, the six-cylinder and eight-cylinder models are mechanically reliable, but over time, they all have the same problem: hydraulics. Although the folding roof was a revelation at the time, it was moved by complicated hydraulic cylinders. I believe there are 11 in total, and they need to be rebuilt regularly at a huge cost. I will have to pass SL. Maybe in later life.

"Miata is always the answer." Unless it isn't. You may remember that I drove a 2019 RF model before finally buying a GS in 2019. I found that it was too small inside, too loud, too rude to ride, and it didn't look like a daily usable car. These are my opinions, not the opinions of TTAC or any other Miata Club What fans. This is not the kind of car I want to own. For me, comfort is more important than lightweight cars. I don’t drive my coupe or convertible on any track. I generally only drive on isolated roads and interstate highways in Ohio and the Midwest. Mita went out.

Yes, this seems to be an obvious choice. But as I said before, SC 430 cooks all the right ingredients in a terrible way. I am not interested in the final SC, and I have already spilled a lot of digital ink to tell you. In most cases, the reviewer will reply "but it is reliable!" and think this is a good contrast to the fact that I don't like SC 430. You all must accept this. If it looks great, like it could have been designed by a better designer, then we will have a different story today. I may not even need to ask you for advice.

Now I will let you relax so that you can make suggestions and tell me that I don't want Miata to be an idiot, and the best cars are from the 60s. Until next time!

[Picture: Lexus, Mercedes-Benz, Mazda, Cadillac]

Become an insider of TTAC. By subscribing to our newsletter, first get the latest news, features, content shot by TTAC, and everything else about the truth about the car.

Two doors, maybe a convertible?

You forgot to include a 4×4 pickup truck with a common cab with a canopy.

2015 Cadillac ELR. I know I know. But this is not Cimaron. ELR is the most beautiful car from Detroit (Hamtrammck) in recent memory. The interior is gorgeous, and their steep depreciation curve has now bottomed out. They are really rare and affordable, and I hope to share some with the more common Volt. Mechanical parts (but don't tell anyone). If you get started now, you can get ELR and upgrade your electric charger...

This is a tough one. You are a very picky buyer, although you are looking for *impractical* I also know that you are not a major hot shoe.

How reliable is Jaguar XK (any generation)? If this is an acceptable level for you, I think one of them may be your best choice.

Other than that, not sure. Maybe Mustang GT is more suitable for luxury?

The 2nd generation XK is a bit over budget unless they are very early and have high mileage. The 1st generation is usually in short supply (there are about 0 coupes), and they all seem to carry a disclaimer of "XYZ required".

I'm not sure if XK is reliable enough to be sure to mess it up.

I am in the same boat. SC430 seems to be my final choice. However, I like its appearance, this is a classic. I will see if I can get a bumper sticker that says "Worst Car". .. In the world". I definitely don’t want to deal with the reliability of Merc anymore. Especially not SL. I agree, Miata is great, but it’s cramped and not the most comfortable.

There are also BMW 3 series and 4 series convertibles. (I don't want to deal with German engineering, I like road trips that won't get me into trouble).

s2000 is more cramped than miata

Lexus is350c is a good choice.

Infinity G37 Convertible should be fine.

I have a 2005 SC 430, which I bought when I was 1 year old. (My neighbor has a 2002). They are very reliable. The color is very different in appearance. Ours is silver/black. They are very reliable and very comfortable to drive. They are great highway cruisers. If you are looking for sports/tracks/drag racing, please look elsewhere. If comfort, handling and reliability are important, take a look. An absolute necessity is to remove all run-flat tires (OEM) immediately and obtain some decent Michelin or Continental rubber.

This may be because I have been seeing these in Florida, but SC430 is just "Early Bird Special" to me. A year ago I drove to a weekend rental, and it was totally...ordinary.

I think I prefer IS350c, but given the relative rarity of 250, their prices have indeed risen. Decently usable rear seats really come in handy, not only for passengers, but also for cargo/pets.

If you click on the "Power" option and turn off traction control, your personality will change. However, they are heavy and a little thirsty. It is very suitable for commuting and sublimates in the summer evening before and after sunset. However, my SC430 did not replace Miata. Despite being a keyboard man, both Miata and SC430 have received a lot of praise.

$20,000 can still provide you with a good choice, automatic transmissions and convertibles are not ideal, so your budget will be more. My personal opinion is that these are all about depreciation, so you may be able to enjoy it for several years and recoup the price you paid.

Yes, although it does not differ from many other suggestions.

It may be tolerable for a fun summer/weekend car, but if you really want to invest real mileage on this, I might revise my answer.

I recently read an article-my goodness, I can't seem to remember where it is-with the headline "You will be crazy to buy a used car now."

Within one or two years from now, the purchasing power of this $22,500 may increase a lot.

Don’t think that the market segment I’m shopping here is particularly part of the general used car market. But I don’t plan to pay more.

So you are in two markets between 10-12 years old (very limited demand, but limited options)-you have been looking there for the past 6 months

2010ish 350 SLK Audi TT or A5 370ZX Infiniti G37 Mustang GT

Older Boxster-with all warnings related to IMS C-5/6 Vette

"But I don't plan to pay more."

But you might, even if it's all cash.

I have played this, but there is no place to store it, there is still a 240 that can be restored.

https://pittsburgh.craigslist.org/for/d/kittanning-1991-capri/7343704420.html

My opinion, expressed as a meme, is superimposed on Corey’s face:

Just got rid of the painful car on the roof

This one is simple: Miata, or maybe an extra clean C6'Vette. But waiting until used car prices are no longer a painful journey.

Specifically, do not consider there. Did you read the entire article?

The price of "ultra-clean" C6 is still much higher than Corey's $22.5K threshold.

This would make him a clean 2003-2004 C5-there may be some grand ones left-but his autopilot-only restrictions put him on a par with the rather bad 4L60E.

In addition, I just don't think Corey is a "Wittman".

I also don't think I am alone. Maybe it's a special edition or higher version of C4 or something. That is a possibility.

I want to talk about C6. I know you can buy them at this price, but they may not be "extra clean" as you said

If you don't need Z06 22.5, we can provide you with some of the best C5.

But just experienced driving a bunch and grabbed one, if you must have an automatic, I can't recommend it. If you must own one, the 6-speed 1 in C6 is much better. The car in C5 takes you back in time, but it's not very good.

I do like the appearance of C4, but I cannot use it every day.

Where's the little carriage? Choose the one you like best and move on... They all have their own advantages, and they are very liveable every day, and the automatics are very sturdy, especially in Dodge.

To be honest, he still has a very good C5 Z06 in his budget, which is worth seeing. That's where I want to put my money, Z06 is a dismissive owner, sold privately.

"Also, I just don't think Corey is a'Wittman'."

It won't be another 25 years or so

The Jeep Wrangler 4xe is impractical enough and convertible enough to be included in this list.

I like Jeep and PHEV, but there is no practical use for Jeep PHEV. unrealistic!

"I will not invest more in this used car. This is a record $22,500."

There is no SUV specifically called out.

2011-2014 Mustang GT Coupe. Automatic or manual. Port fuel injection of 400 horsepower Coyote. Good transmission. Iconic appearance. If you find 2013-2014, you will even get good headlights and taillights.

The trick is to find those that have not been modified. If you do this, you will find something that any Ford dealer can repair. The same engine and gearbox as the F150 means the availability of parts.

Yes, this is where I arrived. Mustang before 2015 (maybe even V6?) or Challenger SXT or R/T, depending on the riding/room/handling/cruising balance you want. I would definitely recommend everyone to drive.

Hundreds of miles of road trips have been carried out in the Challenger. Of course not my cup of tea.

Really? As an owner with about 11 years, I really can't imagine anything better than spending a long day here.

The visibility is poor and the treatment is best described as a float. The engine and gearbox work well together, but this is what I like.

Corey, you hardly said what you are really looking for, except for the logistics of things. These are not the same thing.

Isn’t applying body style, price, transmission, color, and age restrictions enough to narrow the scope?

As mentioned above, I would choose Mustang-although I would recommend Gen V. We have my father’s 2006 manual rags with black lettering on a red background. It still works well and is still pulling hard. I have completed the liquid, tires and battery, nothing more. As a bonus, your spending on such a car will be much lower than your budget.

All-wheel drive challenger with sunroof.

I will give you some other considerations. profession.

When I was in school, my classmates were looking for a career in coding using cobol and Fortran on mainframes and minicomputers. I managed to use UNIX and C. When microcomputers and later PCs appeared, I bought one and started learning to code on them, even though my colleagues thought they were a joke. UNIX and C became Linux and C. Today, VAX/VMS Cobol programmers can still find jobs, but there are many more job opportunities for C/Linux.

Now, ICE writers without EV experience are mainframes in the automotive world and COBOL/RPG/VAX VMS/programmers on Vax. A new platform is not perfect right now, but it will dominate in a few years. Before experiencing new things, how long will you stick to old things?

If you do use an EV, stay away from anything with an air-cooled battery and a driving distance of less than 200 miles. If there is, you will not lack the source material of the article. I realize that the current electric car is definitely not suitable for everyone's living conditions, but you should at least consider your next car from a professional perspective.

Oh, if you do not choose electric cars, I firmly support the Mustang convertible camp. If you have the time and skills, please check the Factory Five 818C version. A lot of article materials.

https://thefactoryfiveforum.com/search.php?searchid=6114491

I currently don't have any charging function at home. My house is old enough and requires complete wiring to put in the charger.

In addition, I have a permanent job that has nothing to do with cars! This is just some interesting writing time.

I think Corey’s budget will completely eliminate this possibility.

Of course, any electric car that sells for $20,000 has a range of less than 200 miles.

Well, before I learned C and C, I started with Z80/x86 assembly language. Then also Java and Python. Well, I also did FORTRAN-mainly differential equations aka Schrodinger equations. There are also some Schoonschips, a little bit. So forget ICE, buy Tesla and start with assembly.

I want to know how good is this registration? ? ! ! :-D

It seems that Mustang GT is the answer. I often rent them out. It's fast, fun to drive, and it sounds great. 2. Very comfortable on the road. Decent reliability, at least it's for household use, so the repair cost when it breaks is reasonable.

I often want to buy a car that is not very practical. However, it is difficult for me to find something I would rather drive than GTI. So, in my case, I would look at Miata because it is more basic and original than Mustang, and the small package is more attractive.

You said that it is not very practical and not completely unrealistic, so I will exclude the Beck 550 Spyder, which is an improved version of the Porsche 550 Spyder in the mid-1950s, but still very faithful. The price has doubled, waiting for two years, only manual gearbox, no air. However, it is a convertible.

A serious suggestion is the low-mileage Infiniti G37 with premium and navigation packages. I have owned my G37S coupe for 13 years and I want to find something new and different to replace it. New and different are not difficult. Even after so many years, it is still looking for something better. At this point, the leading candidate is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range. However, there is no guarantee. I have always been passionate about more than one car, but I was disappointed in the test drive.

Last time you asked what car you want to buy, you just read 161 comments. Now I read your latest request for something unrealistic, according to the Lewis meme.

Decades ago, I almost gave up on advising anyone what car to buy. No one listened, they were all convinced that they knew best.

Surprise all of us. Who needs the public to acquiesce in their choice? I definitely won't. You too. Spreadsheets? a ha ha ha. right.

I did use spreadsheets for pricing and tracking purposes. Yes.

Maserati Coupé Cambiocorsa has the coolest whip in town

Obviously, you need an Eunos Cosmo in your life. I don’t know if 20B is within your budget, but 13B should be achievable.

Hahaha. It's beautiful, but I don't plan to learn Japanese to keep my RHD rarity.

It may not be that bad. Mazda's operations are not large now or at that time, so I expect most mechanical drills to come directly from RX7 and/or 929.

When it comes to impracticality, I have many suggestions. I know you are worried about maintenance costs, but if you feel a little bold, you need to consider a C-Class Coupe or a 1 Series or 2 Series BMW. For something you can expect more reliable, I suggest you check the Infiniti G35/G37/Q60 coupe or Scion FR-S/Subaru BRZ. The modern Genesis Coupe can also be classified there. For American brands, it should start and end with Mustang GT. Not a Ford fan? Then I will consider CTS Coupe, ATS Coupe or GTO. I don't think Corvette will be the worst idea. I am indifferent to the challenger. Please do not buy Camaro.

I will check C, except for a few exceptions, I generally don't care about BMW. The value preservation of FRS and BRZ is so good, which surprised me. They are beyond the price range, even the old ones.

ATS coupe will be considered, however, without the black interior, they seem to be difficult to find.

Too bad, you don't want black... the mileage of this car seems incredible.

https://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?listingId=589210339&vehicleStyleCodes=COUPE&city=Kalamazoo&state=MI&zip=49001&location=&modelCodeList=TTRS&driveGroup=RWD&transmissionCodes=RWD&transmissionCodes=RWD&transmissionCode589Codes=UTA&transmissionCode210 COUPE&city false&sortBy=derivedpriceASC&numRecords=25&dma=&listingTypes=USED&referrer=/cars-for-sale/coupe/kalamazoo-mi-49001?modelCodeList=TTRS&dma=&driveGroup=RWD&driveGroup=RWD&driveGroup=RWD&driveGroup=RWD&driveGroup=RWD000000=000000-RWD0000000000000000000000=RWD000000=000000-RWD-00000000000000000000=RWD000000 -49001?modelCodeList=TTRS&dma=RWDs =include&minPrice=18000&maxPrice=25000&isNewSearch=false&showAccelerateBanner=false&sortBy=derivedpriceASC&numRecords=25&clickType=listing

Strangely, the C and E coupes now cost the same in the same relative year.

E has the advantage of hard top action.

https://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicledetails.xhtml?listingId=593601991

The maintenance fee may be a bit high, but my heart and wallet will go to Audi TT. Buy one with DSG and Quattro and you will have a great time.

How about the used FR-S or BRZ? I tested one, and they will be a great and reliable weekend car, especially if the MX-5 is still (sigh) not on the table.

With these two cars, a set of sticky tires and Hawking Mountain = crazy fun.

This is strange, but BRZ and FRS are almost beyond the budget, and almost all examples are 25k.

Well, I am still very satisfied with my '08 A5, it is very reliable. If it were an S5, I might be happier, but the combined fuel consumption of the S5 is 18 mpg, while the A5 is 24 mpg.

I also like the CTS coupe of that vintage.

I had a TT before that, but my basic model was too slow. Of course there are also faster upgrade models. For hatchbacks, it is even impractical, Quattro allows me to have no trouble on the smooth roads of two Audis. (Of course you can’t say the same to my old Supra Turbo!)

But since Riviera 64, I haven't owned an automatic car, so I can't say how interesting any of these cars will be.

I did not expect TT. They are a bit non-physical around here, never see them. I need a very specific service history.

I think it's new, and the price of TT is a bit high, especially when you can get the same running gear (but the interior is not as good) and it depends on the TT model in GTI/GLI or Golf R. But if there is one that is non-lease at a preferential price, or has been baby and garage. Given the golf/Volkswagen dealer’s experience, I don’t know if anything in VAG is not on your list, but for weekend cars, maybe?

I only see 2-3 TTs here regularly, one of which is owned by someone on the street, so it helps. So you won't see it come or go every day. In your price range, it may be the base TT.

I just priced the second-hand golf rupees in Louisville and Cincinnati. Oof...some as many as new ones.

Do you really want to jump into another VAG journey?

not necessarily. Before another VAG, I will own a Mercedes.

@Art——I look at VAG like Hyundai/Kia.

Many people like H/K because they have a lot of money. They are full of technology, and people like their shape, good warranty and higher reliability. However, I see critics becoming harsher because H/K cannot integrate everything into one package, except for some Genesis models. It seemed that something was missing—chassis dynamics, steering feel, braking feel, suspension adjustments—just to say that they packed all of them into the price point, and then it was over. For many buyers, this is no problem. They reached 80%.

VAG is the same thing. They know how to build and build a solid, serious, German look and feel car. Sturdy doors, comfortable, efficient, stylish, but not exaggerated or "fashionable", and carry a good brand name. However, although they can sweat for the details, they can only reach 80%, because this is a continuous error in their quality and maintenance costs. How many threads does VAG owner have to describe the hellish 60,000 miles or 150,000 nearly trouble-free miles? Unlike H/K, they can build a cohesive package. However, they may drive you crazy due to problems.

All of this, I personally, know that this is going to be a weekend car, and may risk it again just to get a good driver's car, and risk that the water pump will not malfunction or the windows will be pouring heavily.

So in your opinion, which manufacturer will give you 100%?

If you buy Lexus, you will get reliability, but you will also need to spend a lot of money (over $75,000) to get comparable performance (at least before IS500 is launched).

If you buy the Euro brand, you get motivation, but they are relatively expensive and still require maintenance.

If you buy an American or Korean brand, you do get some trade-offs similar to those listed, but usually in exchange for a lower purchase price.

Ajla- I don’t think any car manufacturer can do this, but other car manufacturers have fewer trade-offs. With Toyota/Lexus, excellent reliability and reputation, many people are willing to pay a little more for this. In addition, their real SUVs and trucks compare well with all other models. Honda/Acura. Very similar to Toyota, but more styled. In general, they have a high evaluation of quality, price and reputation. I would put them here before BMW started losing its way around 20 years ago. There is no perfect car. But I think these cater to most people who have the best overall driving experience, quality, engineering, and cost.

I respect Toyota/Lexus very much and always recommend them to people.

However, I personally want a faster vehicle than the RC350/IS350 and I don’t have the money for RCF/GSF/LC500. So this is where the trade-offs happen.

Maybe IS500 will solve this problem, and we will have to look at its cost. However, if Lexus spends more money on porch renovation, G70 or Scat Pack or CT5-V less than $50,000 is a good choice for the trade-offs of these brands.

I'm going to end it. Gen V Mustang or any Citroen 2CV.

Fox body or go home!

Alons enfant de la patrie. Le jour de gloire est Arrivé. Oppose tyranny. L'étendart sanglant est levé L'étendart sanglant est levé Entendez vous dans les campagnes Mugir ces féroces sellats Ils vinnent jusque dans vos bras, Egorger vos fils, vos compagnes bataillons vos armes! Marchons, oui Marchons, Qu'un sang impur abreuve nos sillons, sillon.

You know, here is a one-time writer who owns a Lincoln Mk VIII. For 22.5, you can even sort the suspension.

Have you seen the Mark VIII interior more than 20 years later?

If we wanted an older Ford, I would be strangely attracted to the Ford Thunderbird from the J Mace era. I don’t know demographics or whether people think they are collectible, but for their age, the mileage is surprisingly low.

Demographics and baby boomers both "keep it in the garage" factor. No one buys them for driving reasons.

If you really want to ride crazy, please bring 22k and invest in Dogecoin. You will not forget it soon. If it goes well, you will be excited every day and brag about your rights..lol

Almost bought the '92 SL500 last summer. A gorgeous color combination of sea blue/caramel seats. But of course it has the exact problem you describe, and the top of the power supply is "inoperable". If I have a friend or garage pulley, I can manually remove the heavy hardtop every time (and hope it doesn’t rain on the drive). Or it may be reduced by thousands when repairing. but not. It has also begun to show its age in other, not-so-flattering ways-it is not particularly flexible, has extremely poor fuel economy, etc. But some days I do wish I had tried it for a while, just for the pleasure of driving a car worth $150,000 (adjusted for inflation) at a price well below $10,000.

As for SC, I might choose IS350 convertible or Volvo C70 (second generation, after update). The SC is totally unattractive, it is definitely the "Del Boca Vista Early Bird Special" phone.

The second-generation C70 is very practical, even for 4 passengers. Very comfortable seats, plenty of luggage space, amazing Dynaudio premium sound system, smooth hard top and more. Turbocharging is a pleasure, and I heard that Polestar software optimization is more popular. Unfortunately, FWD limits some fun, but alas, no one is perfect.

IS350 surpasses C70-certainly more than the 2003 C70 convertible example I own. This is hot garbage.

Interested in learning about your C70 Volvo experience. They seem a bit flaky to me, and if there are no internal problems, you won't really see them.

I currently have a 2011, which has almost all the trim options for that model year, from blind spot detection to advanced sound options (worth it). The only internal problem is the peeling of some plastic in the door handle and other places. I believe these problems can be easily handled through the internal details.

Otherwise, the interior seems to be well maintained, and mine has exceeded 100k. If you can find furniture with Nordic oak trim, it is like being in a piece of modernist Swedish furniture.

I often get compliments, probably because it is not common now, and it has never had a follow-up model to make this model look outdated.

I want to remind you to pay attention to it because of your desire for comfort-the front and rear seats have excellent support. In addition to the inherent limitations of front-wheel drive, the overall driving ergonomics is also very good. This is a well-designed, usable and quite unique "vert".

As for maintenance, it uses many engine/transmission system parts shared with C30/V50 models, so it is not difficult or very expensive to maintain the shape. I think it is better than the BMW of that era, but worse than the IS.

Thank you for the detailed information. I will take a look at Volvo. Finding a clean one can be a daunting task.

The C70 MK II is interesting, but it is not without its shortcomings. The main IMO dealer may have your back end. I'm sure there is a special "roof tool", just like the C70 MK I. Rahal in Warrendale charges $168/hr and as a reference, I was told that it would take five hours to replace my window regulators and reprogram my roof.

I would also like to point out that what is truly clean is the price directly from the Dr. Seuss universe.

"According to modern standards, the first generation is an old vehicle."

Oh def a PITA but offers more, including luggage space.

On PVGP last weekend:

https://ibb.co/r2KNd1v https://ibb.co/5Y7Bw4n

My C70 is not a bad car, really. My main problem is that I need a customized Vida/Dice diagnostic device and a Windows laptop to continue working, because OBDII and Hammer can only get one so far. In my example, LTFTs and STFTs are just for beginners. It has great power-with corresponding torque steering-and it will be more surprising than some newer cars. Riding can only be described as "plush", and the accuracy of the gear lever is best described as "shit". This car did not invent understeer, but it has perfected it.

In other words, this is a great cruiser. Even from top to bottom, the engine is very quiet; it pulls hard at low revs; and hoi polloi looks good. Due to the horseshoe-shaped safety ring and roof mechanism, the rear seats are quite small, and the windshield is installed, which is useless.

My air conditioning and heating are very good, and the roof works very well. I don't know if these attributes are common in 18-year-old cars, but I am a little skeptical.

Thank you for making me less trusting of the old Volvo!

Say it again-you have a 2003 C70, right? It's not even worth comparing the two generations of this car.

The second-generation C70 (2006-2013) is not an "update"-it is a completely different car (ie a hard-top convertible instead of a soft-top), it is built on a completely different platform (S40), and is Iteration design company (owned by Ford). Frankly speaking, Volvo even retained the same model name, which is confusing.

This is the only thing worth considering in Corey's search. According to modern standards, the first generation is an ancient vehicle.

"My main problem is that I need a customized Vida/Dice diagnostic device and a Windows laptop to continue working, because OBDII and Hammer can only get one so far. In my example, LTFTs and STFTs are just as initial scholar."

"My air conditioning and heating are great, and the roof is flawless. I don't know if these properties are common in 18-year-old cars, but I am a little skeptical."

Some parts in the air conditioner are poorly made and eventually need to be replaced (maybe the condenser?). We had to refill mine and it was blocked within about 900 miles, but I was told that it was a major PITA to replace this part because it was buried in the dashboard.

After returning from the dealership, my roof storage door decided to lock, but it was resolved during a visit to my mechanic, even though he said they had to remove the rear seat to unlock it.

STFT = short-term fuel correction LTFT = long-term fuel correction

Big picture, over-simplified: Reduce the fuel correction percentage reported on your scanning tool ("real-time data" mode) by 100% and convert it to letter grades. Let you get a good understanding of how satisfied the engine computer is with life. [I know this is because my daughter *must* have a Jeep; but she will say that her 2010 Liberty is currently doing very well-zero fire depends on our old friend Cylinder 2. ]

More details than you need (but I just print it out for future reference): https://www.aa1car.com/library/fuel_trim.pdf

[Check engine light is just pass/fail; Fuel Trim% gives you insight into where you are. ]

Yes, they are not the same car at all. I'm sure that Volvo has retained the same name to attract buyers of my car to become buyers of your car in the future. What is the dwarf talking about?

come on. I tracked down some intake and vacuum leaks on the car, and sprayed MAF several times. The value is better now, but the main problem is that some clots have been running regular gas. I think ECM pulls time and keeps it there. On 91 Octane, STFT returned to normal, and LTFT also returned to normal. Our 17-year-old boy has been in the car for the longest time and is my test driver. He said that the car is now speeding more than 3,500 RPM. The 87's timing is so delayed that it will not spin up and will pull the timing further at higher RPM. This weekend we will make a fuel filter (s?) and five (?!) plugs to bring this little girl back to specifications.

I guess you will buy Cadillac XLR. Its photo ranks first in your list, and you did not say that it is not an option. XLR may be exactly what you need, unless you are ready to buy the Pontiac G6 Convertible. If I were you, I would buy undervalued stocks or mutual funds. Maybe not now, but after the economic collapse.

G6 is a stylistic irony.

if. Very humble car in every way.

Two points oh three links, UConnect GUI, 8 spd auto.

"I am open to things with two doors"

It sounds unnecessary to me.

Guess I'm the only one who thinks that this means that 4 doors are preferred.

Although it does not have the requirements he is looking for at all, you can at least spell the model name correctly.

It's Julia. sigh. At least you didn't spell it as Alfa Romeo.

I think gold will be more reliable than Alpha.

Of course it can, but it is impractical.

Agree, but I mean golf.

I think the answer lies in the comments. The E-Class coupes are cute, they don't require maintenance like some other MBs. Enjoy yours, Corey.

Mustard Saab 9-3 Cabrio likes this: https://www.saabnet.com/tsn/members/gallery.html?memberID=6911&do=show&id=51779

I-you are still rebounding, should wait a while-but you won't.

II-Why do you hate America?

III – Mustang is the obvious choice.

IV – It will be bad, but it will happen (according to my smallest and least impressive crystal ball).

V-Your instincts about Miata are correct. [Meaning a person who wanted a Miata very badly, finally got a Miata and really liked his Miata, until a worse driver in a bigger car crashed into his Miata and sent him ( And his spouse) were taken to the hospital.]

VI-You can do 89,412 other things with this money in 2021 (random example: Peak Television)

Reasons for supporting III (Mustang, you choose the year): a) Output, parts availability, production run time, known problems and solutions, and aftermarket availability. b) You don't think you are a Corvette driver. If you buy a Cadillac convertible, the universe will oppose these articles. c) If you want to buy a second-hand Ford, please buy it assembled in a factory where other Ford cars are sent for repair. [Although: It turns out that most of the traditional ideas surrounding this are completely fictitious-according to the link] https://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/ford/2020/12/23/ford- f-150-repairs-seat-belt-flat-rock-uaw/3994000001/ d) There are many places to get its repairs, and there are many opportunities to customize it according to your personal preferences.

Enjoy the ride. https://youtu.be/3LPWpzNWO88

Almost forgot: e) Second-hand Mustang now allows you to upgrade to a second-hand Mach-E naturally and easily in a few years.

The money is only placed in an interest-bearing account.

That's great. What are the gains? Junk bonds?

A large number of online money markets and savings account banks do not charge any fees. In any case, this is not a big interest. .61%

Considering the low fees, duration bond funds are not much better. I don't know the risk factors of the online currency market, but I thought of the 2008 crash.

Money market accounts are underwritten by FDIC, up to 250k.

Are there Boxsters in this price range? Or will they be a restricted area for immediate maintenance?

Mini club guy? Although I guess Corey didn't want to deal with German engineers for a period of time after golf. There is also a Civic Coupe, but this may not be his cup of tea. He specifically said that there is no hatchback, so the Mazda 3 is also out.

I would say that a mild use example of IS C or G37 coupe is probably the safest choice.

There are also Cadillac ELR and ATS coupe, which are quite cheap these days.

I never liked modern Mini, nor ELR.

ATS is possible and needs to be earlier.

I like ATS. This is a truly modern personal luxury coupe. The other day Bill asked Torronado to be censored. Bring original tires! Its beauty is worth seeing.

Corey, Mini F56 Coopers S Convertible, simply as a rational choice: – 6sp Aisin auto (earlier model year) – Excellent steering – Okayish riding (more than 500 miles of travel, why not) – A true convertible. Drive and forget everything else-we own an 11-year old R57 Coopers S turd (from new to EOL with us): Peugeot's engine is very fragile, but everything else is fine. The roof is still in good condition, although the garage is not visible from the inside (never, really) (yes, it's dry inside)-practicality is unparalleled: suitable for "up to" 4, but the trunk and back seat combination provides Freight practicality of large vehicles-the main reason why we will not get Fiata or F-Type or Boxster or 996 Targa or Z4

Abarth 595C with automatic THE SOUND!

This is painful. Can we see some actual news instead of calling on readers to provide buying advice? Just choose some FFS.

Hey, at least Corey has been producing content. These are the types of articles he has done.

Sorry, were you forced to click into this article and comment on it? Or is it mislabeled, leading you to think you are expecting something else?

Sir, what kind of news do you want, please specify.

90% of my articles are history courses called Rare Rides. Check them.

My goodness, McGee, the only thing more interesting than buying your own unrealistic and fun ride is to offer the same advice to others. Alleviate this and make everyone think/participate

I am tired of seeing articles written by so-called modern "journalists" on TTAC.

If the only option is a car, I will take the Mustang route. If I buy toys, I will buy a few motorcycles. KTM 890 ADV R and 350 EXC-F will be my choice.

I'm in a similar situation, but I want to keep it at around $15,000 and have to drive from top to bottom. I can sell it for $20,000, but it must be the perfect car at that price. I don't get black in appearance, nor to gray, I would rather not have a black interior. Another difference is that I do have a wife, and it is also going to let her drive.

I excluded Germans because I don't want to deal with people over 10 years old. For the same reason, I excluded Miata, I was looking for a comfortable cruiser, not a sports car. I have the same feeling about Lexus, but I don't like its appearance.

So I narrowed it down to T bird or wild horse. If you are outdoors all winter, Thunderbird's hard top may be a good thing. Of course, you need to have a place to store it in the summer. For me, this will be a 6-month old car and will be stored in it in the winter.

For me, T-bird is slightly ahead because most Mustangs sold here are black, silver or gray.

None of these comments mentioned the obvious solution:

You can easily get one within your budget. They are new enough and do not require maintenance. If you need more power, you can adjust the engine. It is really a German car, so you won't miss Volkswagen.

Hungarian engine, Mexican gearbox, Austrian convertible roof system. Assembled in Poland.

So, as "Germany" like the Wera screwdrivers I bought (based on AvE youtube recommendations), they are made in the Czech Republic [and very disappointing].

The cumulative total US sales (historical) is 19,431, which means that Corey will not be able to choose his color (or get repair parts) [rockauto.com currently has zero alternators available on 2018MY; you get from a supplier Select a starter motor at the place].

The Buick Cascada has never been sold in Canada [the greatest country in history], which proves that it is not very good.

After driving his Cascada [8.5 weeks], where is Corey going next? Will he follow Opel to Stellatis? Buying a Buick 4-door SUV (and nothing more)? Your kind suggestion prepares Corey for Future Confusion (when he obviously needs Clarity).

Don't chase "Waterfall", Corey [or any other vehicle with a Spanish style name]. https://youtu.be/8WEtxJ4-sh4

(I know you will act your way, or do nothing, but I think you go too fast)

My Chevrolet Cruze hatchback is also "German". The Germans use expensive motor oil for no reason, and routine maintenance is also extremely complicated. But I found that it is not difficult to find the parts. Although it is threatened with death every day, it has not actually done this in 157k (I defeated it). Since it is a GM car, Cascada may use the same general parts as most GM cars, so I doubt whether finding parts will be a problem.

You say: "I suspect that finding parts will be a problem"

I said: "Currently, there are totally zero AC generators available for 2018MY on rockauto.com; you choose a starter motor from a supplier"

If the part is an alternator, that *is* a problem, now, today. [During Corey’s ownership, this problem will get worse, not better. ]

In contrast, we can choose 8 different alternators and 12 different starter motors for the 2010 Mustang 4.6L V8 on rockauto.com.

(I like that people disagree with me. I prefer them to provide supporting data for their positions.)

"The engine from Hungary, the gearbox from Mexico, the convertible roof system from Austria. Assembled in Poland."

We are the world; we are children.

The only "solution" provided by Cascada is how to immediately prove to others that you don't care about cars, driving or quality.

Cascada is a more complex and less reliable 2001 Chrysler Sebring, and provides exactly the same features.

Yes, but you can drive Cascada without looking like a crawler, which is different from the old Sebring convertible.

How about an "old school building, brick-like" Japanese coupe like SC300/400 or Legend? You can get a lot with your money. I always think that the E320 convertible is a solemn car, without most of the electronic equipment, MB will soon be added to their stables.

Of course, the Mustang GT convertible will also be interesting.

I will discuss the 1st generation SC in the next article.

Do you want a reliable and comfortable 2-door and/or convertible car? I can't think of anything that meets these standards like Solara. *It's a bit like you've been on the way to the special blue plate at 4 o'clock, but I'm not sure how much you care about this.

I respect Solara and see many people living their best lives here. But this is not a car for me.

wake up. My 2004 sc430 drove 98,000 miles, it was very reliable and fast. Ask me about the punk in the Mustang that I brushed off yesterday. Anyone who buys a Volkswagen should endure the pain that comes with it.

That's it for your reliability argument.

I really hope you can read the text of this article. When I wrote, I especially remembered your previous comments and solved everything you just said.

Volkswagen buyers have no right to judge other people's cars.

Hehehe. I suggest you two solve this problem like men, and I think in 2021 it means:

Fill yourself up with the gas tank and see who can get the closest to my bumper when I exceed the limit at 4 mph in the rightmost lane of the interstate.

I am not judging "your car", I am telling you that I don't like SC 430. The fact that you own a car is completely irrelevant.

It helps to separate your emotional attachment to the vehicle from the factual argument.

If you don't like it, why is it on your list? ? Now you can fall asleep again and dream of the Volkswagen Beetle.

"If you don't like it, why is it on your list?"

It is on my NO list. Did you miss that little detail? Read comprehension, try it.

"2004 Lexus SC430 0-60 mph- 5.7 sec.", what kind of Mustang do you want to "dust"? A V6 93?

I also plan to recommend Buick Cascada. This is a newer German-designed two-door convertible that is within your price range and can have a non-black interior.

It's pitifully slow, and...this is a Buick.

I will buy a Saab 9-3 convertible from 200110-12. You can find a full load below 20K. Seat 4 So it's still "a bit" practical, but still a lot of sexy, and it's great to drive.

I dare to let you buy a German car that is out of warranty. On the bright side, you will get a lot of material for future articles.

A few years ago, my wife and I were in the same predicament. We want a coupe. Found a CTS coupe and still like it. Very reliable, 3.6 is a great engine. The stereo is excellent. And things you don’t see every day.

The SC430 2UZFE turbo is smooth and can run forever, with beautiful wood and leather inside, so you can't see the outside while driving.

I would say that you really don't want a convertible with a cloth top. Parked outside all year round, the top will deteriorate rapidly, which will become a heavy expense. In addition, the weather in Ohio is very similar to the weather in Northern Virginia. The winter is cold and crappy, and the summer is very hot and uncomfortable, with about 10 days of ice in between. Either it is too hot or too cold to put the top down. Otherwise you will worry about rain. Eventually you will wonder why you want a convertible in the first place. I’m speaking as the husband of someone who has to own a convertible, which may have driven 2,000 miles in the past 3 years. I posted this from the beach house we rented, and we drove her forest instead of a convertible.

Buy an old Pontiac—especially the 2005-2006 GTO. You can get red or blue inside, and it has a very reliable LS2 bulletproof 4-speed automatic. The seats are very comfortable front and rear, and any weaknesses may have been resolved so far-none of them are the main ones, and they won't get you into trouble. They are great for driving on the street, and they will excite you as long as you want. Due to early speculators, most people keep their mileage low, and $22,500 will provide you with a nearly perfect example, you will not be afraid to drive. In the end, the value has only just begun to rise. You can probably buy one now and drive it for a few years, and then sell it for the price you paid, if not more.

Correct, the roof was not considered. Whenever I saw them in a vehicle a few years ago, they looked like rubbish.

How about 350Z or 370Z? Prices can be seen everywhere, but if you are patient, a good convertible will indeed appear in your price range.

The 370Z is fast, but driving it is like playing a bongo drum. Noisy and rough. G37 or EX37 will be a better long-distance partner.

I don't really expect this to be what you are looking for, but I would really like a series of articles about SSR life.

I like the idea of ​​a pony car, such as Dodge Challenger or Mustang GT. Easy to maintain and repair, good enough reliability, keep a follower for resale and a lot of fun. In addition, they are to a large extent comfortable everyday vehicles.

The numbers of these cars are staggering. I rented a 6-cylinder Mustang convertible, and it blows as shameful as the old 5.0 V8 (even though I still have to own a V8). Therefore, even cheap entry-level things are still interesting.

This is why most people don't think about it and fall into romance. "Man, this is rare, wow, you have never seen it before!" That may be because they always cast a shadow behind the imported repair shop.

One of the great advantages of pony carts is that they are rear-wheel drive, plus the (final drive) gear exchange is cheap and easy. If it is not equipped with 3.73 seconds, the effect is significant. V8 and 4.10 are definitely popular.

The problem with Fox 5.0s was that their final score was 2.73. The "secret menu" allows (ordered) 3.08 seconds, but this is still sad. Think about how small and light they are.

This is CAFE nonsense. Gear shifts are ridiculously cheap, and they should come from the factory.

It’s amazing how many people in that era ignored this model, maybe one mile per mile can get a vehicle that feels 1,000 pounds lighter.

It is more like a "correction" than a model. In addition to broken tires, fixing you on the performance of the seat, the performance of the car is better. And it sounds better. Coupled with excellent engine braking.

Stock, gear spreads are stupid. Recovery speed, you always fall into a huge gap, saying that 3rd will be in trouble, 2nd is a bit too low.

Most of my driving is on 55, boulevards, and blocked highways. 5th gear/overdrive is not available until 65 mph, and 4th gear is uncomfortably high.

Fox 5.0 runs very well on the 3.73 gear, and you will swear it was designed for it. The whole car.

Mustang is definitely a financially safer choice, more suitable for people who shop through electronic forms.

I shop through spreadsheets to track what I want to search for, as well as various prices, links, colors, etc. This is not exactly a power and service cost indicator.

understood. The E93 hardtop should be very reliable. The same goes for DCT. M3 will not bother you with continuous maintenance and downtime, but it certainly has some large items that can keep you awake at night. It may be okay if you don't drive often. Most of them have reached the depreciation bottom line. Available in color, internal and external.

Double Vanos. But if you can't get the ball off it, why do you do it?

If you want to be less practical, there is only one way to go. Get the best 911 and enjoy life.

This prompted me to look at some Targa roof configurations (because Corey doesn't want fabric). [Also read the budget, but it is not long. ]

Edit: Corey has covered the 911 recommendations above (but disguised as "996"). [Germany is complicated. ]

Do not. 996 doesn't count. Only 911, 911 Turbo, GT2 or GT3.

Okay, I'm lost. (I think I will fry an egg.) [Enjoy with coffee (which is a liquid). ]

It should be said that it is air-cooled 911, 911 Turbo. But if you must go for water cooling, GT2, GT3.

The above sounds like a "dad" car. Not practical, but suitable for the weekend or shuttle between work and family to soothe yourself.

If there are family members at home, the self-evident message is "Don't touch it, don't even ask to drive"! ! !

The R32 GT-R is twice his budget, and the R32 GTS-T is mostly higher than the budget.

An unknown suggestion: the second-generation Acura CL.

Show how much I know.

I think it at least ticked the unrealistic box. Personally, I just find the novelty of right-hand drive vehicles in the United States very interesting, although I am not sure how much I have to endure every day or semi-regularly.

"...No black interior..." It will be difficult. It seems-everything-is black by default. With some grand budget, you can ask a store to provide any color of interior decoration you want.

I know you don’t like hatchbacks, but maybe the C30 is unique enough to be considered. There is also a 5-cylinder engine. This is a car with personality.

Maybe it's the Accord Coupe with V6, although I bet that even the Coupe will drive up the price in this market.

I recommend using Mini S hardtop or convertible. You get a BMW turbocharged four-cylinder engine with an S, and if you buy a hardtop, there is plenty of storage space after the rear seats are folded. Use it as 2 seats. Same as a convertible, but with much smaller luggage space. Either way, it is fun for you and that special person.

I recommend using Mini S hardtop or convertible. You get a BMW turbocharged four-cylinder engine with an S, and if you buy a hardtop, there is plenty of storage space after the rear seats are folded. Use it as 2 seats. Same as a convertible, but with much smaller luggage space. Either way, it is fun for you and that special person.

Two-door convertible, you want comfort, not lightness. I was shocked that a real answer has not yet appeared. You must choose Nissan's best convertible ever... Murano CrossCabriolet! There are many under $20,000!

It should be said that the air-cooled 911, 911 Turbo (98 and before). But if you have to go for water cooling, GT2, GT3.

I don’t know what you can get except for the black interior:

2003-06 What will the Pontiac GTO look like these days? There is no convertible, but you can take off the Vette engine parts. I have seen some with red seats, but I doubt you will find most of them with black interiors.

Hahahahahaha I started a trend!

Given your climate, unless you are looking for a suitable backup for your primary, the mobile garage queen soft top convertible can only be used for six months a year and can be purchased in cash. There will be no XLR and you don’t seem to like Corvette, so in fact these choices are:

R107 Mercedes SL (MY71-89) Fox Mustang 5.0 CONV (MY79-93) SN-95 Mustang GT CONV (MY94-04) or SN-197 (MY05-14) F-Body Camaro or Firebird CONV (93-02) BMW E30 CONV (MY82-92) or E36 CONV (MY93-99) E-body Reatta CONV (89-91)

Elegance and collection value are the pride of West Germany. The R107 has a soft top and a detachable hard top. If your example had an uncertain soft top when you first purchased it (and after the weather starts to change, but you like short trips on the roof), then this great. These are usually expensive AFs, but I have read some examples and their prices are closer to 30-40 year old cars. Finding the right person will leave a lot of cash for reconnaissance, because pedigree mechanics are always available, and resale always exists. The main disadvantages include the semi-exotic, R12 conversion, and the need to turn the wrench occasionally, whether it is troubleshooting trivial matters or actually performing mechanical work.

Huge aftermarket, rising valuations, classic styling, popular chassis and trees suitable for shade. The main IMO is AOD, and you should replace it immediately. A/C can be converted, but I am not sure how complicated it is.

SN-95 Mustang GT CONV or SN-197 (MY05-14)

Classic 90s or 00s style, but can be used in 4.6/auto, but I will shoot 97. Good aftermarket, reliable driver line, not exotic. Starting from R134a, A/C should be no problem.

F-Body Camaro or Firebird CONV

Before the 3800 took over, even the crappy F body was equipped with 60V6. Although everyone prefers various V8s, you can trust one of them V6 (different from Ford's 3.8 Essex and Mustangs' 4.0 Cologne). R134a is attached (except for MY94, please check).

BMW E30 CONV or E36 CONV

The beautiful chassis, the E30s are highly regarded. Like the SL, they are new enough to provide modern convenience, but old enough that they are not fully computerized. You specify automatic, so the joystick/chassis handling things that many Bimmer people like are not really applicable, but for the right money, you can still have enough money after all the reconnaissance is complete.

It may be a pipe dream at this point, but you seem to like these and the drivetrain, thinking about your divine authority. The main disadvantages include unobtanium interior/body parts, pop-up headlight motors (these parts may not exist for twenty years), R12, and public obscurity. I will add Allante but well, I'm pretty sure that is not.

XK8 CONV built after July 25, 2000

I just didn't see it happen, please explain otherwise.

XJS CONV 94-96 with I6

Saw some this weekend, now it has surpassed stupidly expensive.

It is difficult to find the right money, plus the well-known headaches.

Surprisingly, IS C and SLK are not on the list-these two cars are certainly not as fragile as Volvo or E30.

You either buy something older but good for cash and scout, or you buy newer things for 20K and hope that there is no scout-apart from the R107 or the newer Mustang, I don't see much middle ground. I try to keep in touch with the former more because it is what I do and it works very well.

IS C will be $$$, but if it goes higher, it may be the best choice. SLKs have good times and bad times. Over the years I have heard that they can become PITAs, and the "real" owners will buy SL. This is the one I'm considering recommending to a friend, but it's a stick, and it won't work for him:

https://pittsburgh.craigslist.org/cto/d/dickerson-run-2000-mercedes-slk-sport/7349891345.html

I also think that with SLK (or IS), you are in the same boat as the E46 BMW or Volvo C70 1 or 2, which is very dealer-centric and computer-centric.

What is your expected term of ownership?

I find that I usually keep things for 2-4 years before getting bored.

I only like the third-generation SLK, it seems to have a lot less problems than the first-generation (too old) or the second-generation (don't like the appearance).

It's a bit short, mine is usually 10 years, the shortest is 5 years, but despite this, you need something that you will appreciate, and all the strange things I named in most cases will not be after reconnaissance. Then spend all the money on IS because it will not disappoint you and you will get the money back in 24-48 months. I don't think you can get CPO on things from the 00s at this time, so it has some restrictions on things like the third-generation SLK.

Yes, SLK must be a 2010-2012 car to meet the budget.

I know we have excluded R129, but:

https://pittsburgh.craigslist.org/ctd/d/pittsburgh-1992-mercedes-sl500/7356310050.html

"It also has a removable hard top and soft top"

Are there some versions that do not have a folding hardtop, but have a soft and detachable hardtop like the R107?

Therefore, the settings of the R129 are exactly the same: the folding soft top and the hard top that is sucked onto the car by the hydraulic system. No bolts are needed to remove it, but you do need two people and a bracket to fix the top. I entered a hard recharge in the article, a typo.

Let's observe that the dealer is now guiding Corey in a direction that he has clearly stated that he does not want to go.

I am not a dealer, but your husband may be a tool.

@28, great-make me sneer. :-)

Fixed-roof coupes are a bit rare (although they can be found), but there seems to be a considerable number of convertibles on the ground.

hemmings.com/classifieds/dealer/mercedes-benz/e320/2449926.html hemmings.com/classifieds/dealer/mercedes-benz/e320/2506610.html

I feel embarrassed to park such a beautiful classic car outside all year round.

I know I’m late to the party, but here I am!

1. Infiniti Q50. The sporty RWD/AWD sedan, equipped with a sweet VQ engine, reliable and good functions, is a sedan with good (but not enough) rear legroom. 2014-2016 models can be purchased within budget.

2. Acura TLX. The Sweet K24 engine is reliable and well-equipped. Although front-wheel drive, it drives very well. 2015-2017 models can be purchased within your budget.

3. The second-generation Chevrolet Volt. I know I know that this is a GM product. Compared with the other two products, its internal quality is not good, and the market is obviously declining. But Chevrolet's goal is excellent fuel economy, a very reliable hybrid system, and a unique design. Although it is technically HB, it does not look like one. 2016-2018 models can be purchased within budget.

Honorable mention: 2015 or 2016 Cadillac ATS coupe. Those with tiny backseats are super impractical, look elegant at the price, and have a good frame (Alpha platform shared with Camaro). Although there is only a 4-cylinder turbocharger in the budget, the driving power is comparable to the Q50. Definitely worth seeing

It is difficult to find a high enough mileage to fit the budget, without a black interior.

You must be logged in to leave a comment.